Also Like

Building Resilience to Droughts in a Changing Climate: Strategies and Solutions

 The present shift in climate has significantly increased the severity of weather extremes such as droughts and floods. Drought is defined in two ways: according to the WMO, it is based on meteorological events such as a prolonged period of abnormally dry weather, while the disaster preparedness department of the Kenya National Disaster Management Unit perceives drought as a prolonged shortage of water in a particular area in Kenya.

Building Resilience to Droughts in a Changing Climate

1. Introduction

 The consequences of droughts are often more destructive when they occur in middle-latitude regions with agriculture as the main economic activity. Non-widely considered as a natural disaster, drought commonly brings about various environmental impacts, making it a key topic of concern for climate change experts.

Droughts are normal in all climatic zones, and their frequency and intensity differ from one region to another. Globally, about 70% of countries are affected by drought, which in turn affects more than 1.5 billion people. This means that drought potentially has the largest widespread impact on society.

According to the World Meteorological Organization (WMO), drought is a natural phenomenon in all climatic zones and is usually associated with socio-economic and environmental impacts. Willis Akhwale also compared life skills with drought by stating that life skills are like the deep roots of a tree that anchor individuals firmly in the soil. A decline in resilience in life skills may be similar to having a shallow root base that is easily uprooted in times of storm or drought.

2. Understanding Droughts and Climate Change

This article addresses two primary issues in dealing with the challenge of future droughts in the context of climate change:

  • understanding the events
  • developing strategies to lessen their negative impacts.

The understanding of events considers the nature of drought risks and vulnerabilities; this understanding is important because underpinning needs for strategies to build resilience are data on the impacts of droughts on the physical environment and ecosystems, the extent to which people are sensitive and exposed to drought impacts, and the efforts of communities and institutions to manage and cope with droughts. 

Understanding and anticipation build the basis for creating coherent, strategic, and specific solutions to reduce vulnerabilities, increase the adaptive capacity of human and natural systems to drought, and build resilience.

Drought has always been a fact of life in the United States. When one occurs, the consequences and impacts on the physical environment, ecosystems, people, and communities are substantial and can be disabling. The situation internationally is considerably worse. The developing countries endure withering droughts that produce catastrophic food shortages and widespread suffering. What is different in our current situation from challenges in the past is the reality of sustained changes in the Earth's climate.

These changes are caused by human activities, primarily the release of greenhouse gases. Both the reality and the totality of these changes have been dismissed in national conversations in recent years, driven in part by propaganda on the part of special interests. Global warming has now been recognized as an existential threat, and the challenges ahead have never been more profound.

3. Strategies for Building Resilience

a/. Utilizing the potential of new technologies and better monitoring of the onset of droughts : 

The intelligence and information to engage in adaptive actions at the early stages of drought can expedite the development of timely, effective, and wise drought response, in turn influencing the outcome of drought mitigation efforts. Advancements in the area of technologies can help engage in drought resilience and drought mitigation in a proactive and positive manner. 

Future work on drought resilience should not only use new technologies to become more effective in monitoring droughts but should also develop capabilities to early respond to droughts, as judicious actions of timely relevancy can do much to mitigate the negative impacts of droughts.

b/. Combined policies and mixed-instrument approaches:

The basic tenet is that no single policy or approach can effectively mitigate the negative impacts of droughts. It is important to maintain congruence by optimizing a suite of approaches to reduce the space for increasing the negative impacts of droughts. It is also necessary to reduce conflicts, increase synergies, and work to create a variety of protective measures that will interact and work on the future direction of droughts.

 Below are listed some of the key strategies that can contribute to building resilience to droughts: utilizing the potential of new technologies and better monitoring of the onset of droughts; using different blended approaches and making the best use of mixed-policy instruments; policy innovations and institutional mechanisms; strategies for dealing with political and policy uncertainty; and future directions for building drought resilient economies.

4. Water Conservation and Management



Public supply accounts for the smallest volume of water-cooled, which includes residential water supply, industrial water supply, and commercial water supply. The amount of water consumed each day by the public sector, which includes homes, businesses, schools, and government buildings, in the United States is roughly 44 billion gallons per day.

This includes water supplied by public water suppliers, self-supplied groundwater, and self-supplied surface water used in the public sector for drinking, food service, and sanitation activities. The residential portion of water use is significantly impacted by population growth and residential water use could show projected increases in the western region of the United States by 2030. The decrease in water supplies is a major issue in Central and Southern areas, such as the Colorado River and the Rio Grande region, which are influenced significantly by population growth and climate change.

According to the 2015 U.S. Geological Survey water use report, the United States used a total of 322 billion gallons of freshwater per day, and the largest use of that water came from thermoelectric power plants, irrigation, and public supply. The energy sector withdraws more water than any other sector. The large amount of water used by the thermoelectric power plants is mostly for cooling.

 Currently, once-through cooling is used for roughly 45% of all thermoelectric power plants, but this method is being phased out due to the detrimental impact it has on local aquatic life populations. For example, over 106 plants that take advantage of once-through cooling, 13% of the United States current thermoelectric power capacity, withdraw from freshwater sources which impacts local aquatic populations. Withdrawals as a result of cooling have been a major concern in regions such as the Midwest, where the Mississippi River Basin and Great Lakes have been impacted significantly by the high amounts of water withdrawn.

4.1. Diversification of Water Sources

Economic arguments generally favor centralized water supply, treatment, and delivery systems that share costs across a large customer base. Decentralized systems, including direct-use rainwater systems and individual desalination, are generally more expensive, particularly when distributed over small per-customer volumes. Climate change could lessen this economic impediment to diversity, primarily by changing temperatures.

 Miguel et al. found that each 1.8°F (1°C) increase in temperature brought a 0.8–1.4% incremental increase in annual water purchase and delivery costs for an individual source from a desalination plant with a land or sea discharge. Miguel et al. suggest that when saline source water is available for desalination, average water purchase and delivery costs increase by 0.8–1.4% for each 1°C increase.

Conservation and efficient use of water resources is an essential element in adapting to climate change and variability, particularly where traditional sources are diminishing in response to flow reductions due to rising temperatures and increased water demand.

 In addition to managing existing sources more efficiently " often described as economic efficiency" an additional approach gaining prominence is to diversify water sources, usually described as supply reliability.

Diverse alternative sources of water, such as stormwater, rooftop collection, treated wastewater, brackish water, seawater, water harvested from fog, or water from surface water or groundwater storage, can create a more flexible urban water system that can be used to buffer climate, regulatory, and other uncertainties. Diversifying water sources increases the resilience of a water supply system by increasing the availability of supplies under a broader set of conditions.

The growing interest in diversity reflects the fact that many of the low-cost supply-side water options that urban areas traditionally relied upon, especially in the American West, are no longer available. As traditional water sources diminish in response, urban water managers are focusing more attention on thermal and health-related constraints that limit acceptable options for meeting urban water demands.

4.2. Improving Agricultural Practices

Agricultural Practices

Improving commodity efficiency consists of improving water, land, or energy use for productive purposes and tends to reduce pressure on specific resources. For example, increasing the production of a specific crop per ton of water consumed achieves a larger production per unit of water applied (crop per drop) and can result in reduced pressure on that particular water resource. 

Those practices vary widely between countries and regions, depending on the types of crops grown and climate conditions. Options to improve those performances range from technical improvements, such as improving crop variety or fertilization strategies, to broader policy interventions like incentives or regulation. Several implementation challenges need consideration for improving commodity efficiency, especially regarding economic, social, and equity impacts.

For example, improving water productivity atthe plot level should consider direct and indirect economic, social, and environmental impacts to guarantee a more inclusive strategy.

Agriculture is both a victim of drought and a water user. From 1980 to 2014, agriculture accounted for 20% of economic losses due to natural disasters worldwide, with 42% of those losses due to droughts. At the same time, agriculture is deeply dependent on water resources, with 70% of all freshwater withdrawals used for agriculture.

Yet agriculture is often considered a "low-hanging fruit," as economically efficient solutions exist that also improve crop productivity and resilience to both increasing pressures on the resource and increased uncertainties under climate change. It is relatively easy to implement more economic behavior (e.g., through pricing mechanisms), improve productivity, and reduce damage to agriculture while safeguarding the environment.

4.3. Enhancing Early Warning Systems

Incorporating an early warning system for fire management at the municipality level within existing effective local responses creates a sustainable DBF early action. A major challenge for early warning systems in most parts of the world is the operational capacity regarding knowledge, staff, and investments.

 As is clear from the implementation gaps, detailed scientific information is of limited value to most communities experiencing unexpected fire impacts. Engaging local active fire experts (fire brigades) as early as possible has major potential for improving this situation. The knowledge priority should be identifying the available local resources and designing methods for integrating these data sources to produce solutions that are most effective in the local context. Accurate risk forecasts are essential, but they are not of primary importance in practice, and may even disrupt action.

A transparent and timely information flow to all involved ddecision-makers andstakeholders is vital to ensure the intended use of drought and fire risk forecasts. This need is validated across case studies in Spain, Brazil, and the U.S., where research uncovered challenges to integrating risk forecasts within the context in which potential actions become available and feasible.

Results show that forecasts alone will likely not assure the successful use of an early warning system because decision-makers generally apply their own context and discount the probabilistic information provided by the forecast.

Therefore, the early warning system should be designed in connection with the needs and responsibilities of drought and fire management and with decision-makers' perceptions of risk and current vulnerability conditions. Identifying effective communication pathways and formats is necessary so that risk forecasts are correctly interpreted, integrated with available information, and culminate in concrete actions to reduce fire hazard or severity.

5. Implementing Solutions

Innovative, demand-driven, bottom-up measures that support communities and individuals should be developed more broadly, aligning the overall working principles advocated by the CARE-WWF Vulnerable Twenty (V20) Group with local stakeholder needs and based on empowering the community to lead the initiative.

In Madagascar, for example, weather index insurance provided a safety net to the most vulnerable households in thesouthwestt of the country, facing annual food shortages following recurrent drought events.

Specific and direct action can be taken at the community level, enabling risk reduction through collective action and mutual assistance. Indeed, local communities possess a wealth of valuable knowledge on management strategies that help cope with and recover from drought stress.

 National authorities need to work closely with community representatives, providing the necessary support in setting up local private or community drought insurance, micro-credit schemes, social safety nets, water conservation schemes, early warning systems, and knowledge transfer and improving the general information base for intervention.

Second, in view of the high frequency of drought events, the prolonged duration of the associated suffering,g and the negative feedback of drought vulnerability and poverty on each other, there is a case to be made for incorporating droughts into the list of high-profile hazards, such as cyclones or floods, with established crisis management systems, coordination and response measures.

Given the magnitude and complexity of the interventions required to bridge the institutional and policy gap in enhancing drought resilience, several considerations are essential. First, it is crucial to integrate drought risks into national development plans, recognizing the economic and social impact that drought disasters have in developing countries.

This is necessary for mainstreaming disaster risk reduction into development policy, and for aligning disaster responsiveness with longer-term development objectives.

5.1. Policy and Governance

The report underscores that evidence on the relationship between climate change, drought, and social dimensions (associated with gender, education, literacy, age, occupation, experience in farming, etc.) is useful for devising climate information and extension services programs.

There was also a call for the mainstreaming of gender issues into the policy process for gender-sensitive planning, information delivery, participatory management, and gender equity. Periodic review and updating of administrative policies and procedures necessitate the effective implementation of risk management processes. Coordinated and holistic sectoral policies assume significance.

 National, state, and district-level authorities must promote policies that allow for science and evidence-based, coordinated, and integrated drought risk management processes. Further, enhancing public-private partnerships that allow the leveraging of the private sector to enhance technology transfers and innovation spending was suggested to enhance resilience.

Societal efforts to achieve resilient farming systems are constrained and influenced by various policy, governance, and societal issues. Enhanced support from governments through policy and governance mechanisms or interventions can improve resilience.

Many policies and institutions already have a strong influence on the resilience of rural communities to climate variability. Improving these existing mechanisms or developing new ones can accelerate resilience-building. At the same time, progress in meeting long-standing development challenges, such as poverty eradication and food security, can both directly increase resilience and provide valuable learning for other complex systems.

 Policy and Governance

In contrast, some policies and institutions have been seen to have had a negative influence on resilience. In part, they resulted in societies tending to adapt to particular hazards, i.e., different projects and schemes designed to cope with drought as it exists today, rather than with the drought that is likely under climate change.

5.2. Community Engagement and Education

Activities geared at making drought and climate research personally relevant and straightforward to communities, both often rooted in or inspired by such work, are the most effective.

Community meetings, participatory planning exercises, and gatherings are usefully weighed against widely accessible and customizable content made available by partners. Ideally, this tool would provide users with key resources, such as a community education activity guide, a community hazard planning template, and drought-relevant didactic content customizable to partners.

Through this, community leaders, educators, and scientists can all be on the same page and the benefits of research are carefully communicated and directly applicable to issues that communities prioritize surrounding drought and other hazards.

Those responsible for making large-scale and long-term decisions on water planning and management often struggle to earn the confidence of the general public and make the process as transparent as possible. In situations where current and future drought conditions, and the associated long-term impacts on water availability, are not well understood or fully appreciated by the general public, they may, quite naturally, resist policy actions that have significant societal costs. While education in and of itself cannot directly increase the public's knowledgeofn drought and climate science concerns, partner communities and organizations can help support the broader application of research and data to key lapses within communication and understanding.

5.3. Infrastructure Development

The environment for development in Africa is changing rapidly. Climate change will have huge and negative impacts on a large variety of sectors, including agriculture, water, energy, infrastructure, and human security. Infrastructure is a crucial enabler for inclusive growth and poverty reduction in most countries.

infrastructure development

The continent will heavily depend on seasonal rainwater for its socio-economic development. Therefore, efficient and effective development and delivery of agricultural infrastructure that will help produce food and other crops is a prime prerequisite for Africa's desired development.

With the release of Africa's Agriculture Status, it is evident that most great economies are employing agriculture as a lead factor in promoting production and employment to achieve growth targets. It therefore follows that if Africa is to achieve significant success in development, attention to the continent's infrastructure, including agriculture, should receive due attention.

The central theme in the climate change discourse is how Africa shall cope with the adverse impacts of climate. Sub-Saharan Africa bears the burden of dealing with the harsh reality due to its heavy reliance on agriculture, which is the backbone of its economy.

With agriculture still being rainfed and total dependence on weather and climate, vulnerability to climate change and variability limits the potential of the continent to achieve the necessary growth to address poverty levels, putting the continent’s development back in terms of achieving desired international development paths.

Innovations in infrastructure and the agriculture sector, which still employs over 65% of Africans' labor, should be an integral part of broader strategies aimed at achieving sustainability, growth, prosperity, and ending poverty to buffer shocks and make countries thrive despite the new challenges that climate change brings.

6. Research and Innovation

Research issues are many, as the latest multi-project national drought assessment report attests. Issues with special relevance to drought management are, in particular, the regionalization of drought severity indicators, the improvement of impact assessment methods, the effectiveness of the decision support systems, the impacts of water infrastructures, the impacts of dried soil layers, the water loss mechanisms, and the so-called second-order effects. 

As to the resolution of the latter as well as the penetration of drought management plans into societal practice, research mustn't confine itself to studying technical or administrative measures only. Surveillance and control of the development of "information deficits," of the excessive loss of trust in drought managers or authorities, or of the changes in personal or cultural elements are also the domain of existential research topics.

The research represents the quintessentially long-term approach to improving our understanding of droughts and their impacts, under present conditions and with increasing climate change. It also forms the basis through which innovation can be put in motion, so as to optimize existing drought management plans and to achieve further improvements in the penetration, application, and acceptance of such plans among stakeholders.

A systematic approach is to follow the process from policy recommendations to strategy formulation to implementation and evaluation, and backward through adaptive management. The basic concept is a cycle of progress promoted through:

  • (a) a periodic review and assessment to detect problems or opportunities and to generate changes in policies, procedures, or activities.
  • (b) adaptive management, based on revised strategies or solutions.



DISAZABLOGGER
DISAZABLOGGER
This dynamic blog features various articles on science & technology, culture, and personal development in terms of environment and well-being.
Comments